In the session recordingsAre they differentSemahead CSS Tests In the case of the first two analysesthe order of execution is arbitrary and they can and should be repeat many timesiteratively. Both analyzes complement each other. Questions pos in one are often answer in the other. The situation is different in the last section of analyzes – tests. Unlike data analysis and UX analysiswhich are non-invasive because they are bas on information already collect collect data and the available version of the website- tests engage users directly by introducing changes to the website or attaching a survey to it.
The great advantage of the tests
For this reasonit is worth implementing user research only after analyzing the information that is already available to us. Thanks to the hypotheses set earlieryou can prepare more precise tests that will answer your doubts. is that they collect completely new datawhich allows you to deepen the existing analyzes and see how your users will react to changes in the Country Email List search engine. Which tests you use should depend on the information you’ve gather in previous analyses. Here are some possibilities: Surveys on underperforming search results pages – the search results page is not always as obvious as the lack of results.
If you are not sure why some
Of the terms do not engage users after searching for themit is worth just asking them. A/B search engine CTA test you can test virtually every element of the page. A call to action is one of those elements that doesn’t have a one-size-fits-all version. – So it’s a great LOB Directory area to see. If you can engage more of your users in search. First click test of the page with no results – you can invite. A random part of the website users to such a test through a pop-up window.
