Only refunds are given to those who have been damaged? Some merchants and small and micro e-commerce companies are being cleared out.
I saw a joke a few days ago and thought it was just funny? but I didn’t expect that the living conditions of small and micro e-commerce companies have become so bad.
The paragraph is as follows Some merchants
Although it is a joke? it is entirely possible that if the design patterns: learn about the different types and their benefits buyer is determined to find fault and want to take advantage of the situation.
A buyer who looked up an order that was confirmed to have been received three months ago? found a defect? and then asked for a refund? which was successful. The most exaggerated record of a refund was an order from two years ago? worth 1?300 yuan? which was also directly fleeced? as shown in the figure below:
Others? perhaps just want to take advantage of a small use of a gift certificate by a single tax payer advantage for a moment? for example? deliberately cut the packaging with scissors and falsely claim that the delivered food is damaged. Since the food cannot be returned and resold? the merchant will have no choice but to accept a refund.
Ordinary people may not be
Able to imagine the motivation for taking advantage of global seo work the refund only? but after the mask? for some families with extremely tight financial situation and no income? the refund only has become a “way out” for them.
Some sellers were so angry about being fleeced that they traveled thousands of miles to seek justice from the buyer who only refunded the money. However? when they found the buyer? they found that the buyer was already living a very poor life. Small and medium-sized sellers are not “rich people”? but they are fleeced by a group of “poorer” people. Living by fleecing others may be a scene that we cannot understand and find difficult to see? but such a scene has surfaced as the refund-only policy has been adopted by various e-commerce platforms one after another.
